Showing posts with label Sinking Ship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sinking Ship. Show all posts

Friday, November 03, 2006

Walls fall down

Well now, really. What did we expect from rats? They always desert the sinking ship. Now the architects of the Mess in Mesopotamia are turning on the administration in droves. Some brief excerpts from the Vanity Fair article from October 2006.
Richard Perle

Perle, who left the Defense Policy Board in 2004, blames the unfolding catastrophe on a central cause: dysfunction within the Bush administration. Perle states, "The decisions did not get made that should have been. They didn't get made in a timely fashion, and the differences were argued out endlessly.…"

Kenneth Adelman

"I just presumed that what I considered to be the most competent national-security team since Truman was indeed going to be competent. They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the post-war era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."

Michael Rubin

"Where I most blame George Bush is that through his rhetoric people trusted him, people believed him. Reformists came out of the woodwork and exposed themselves." By failing to match his rhetoric with action, Rubin adds, Bush has betrayed Iraqi reformers in a way that is "not much different from what his father did on February 15, 1991, when he called the Iraqi people to rise up, and then had second thoughts and didn't do anything once they did."

David Frum

David Frum is the mastermind who dreamed up the 2002 State of the Union address, the so-called "Axis of Evil" speech.

It now looks as if defeat may be inescapable, because "the insurgency has proven it can kill anyone who cooperates, and the United States and its friends have failed to prove that it can protect them." This situation, he says, must ultimately be blamed on "failure at the center"—starting with President Bush. Frum goes on "I always believed as a speechwriter that if you could persuade the president to commit himself to certain words, he would feel himself committed to the ideas that underlay those words. And the big shock to me has been that although the president said the words, he just did not absorb the ideas. And that is the root of, maybe, everything."

Eliot Cohen

"I wouldn't be surprised if what we end up drifting toward is some sort of withdrawal on some sort of timetable and leaving the place in a pretty ghastly mess.… I do think it's going to end up encouraging various strands of Islamism, both Shia and Sunni, and probably will bring de-stabilization of some regimes of a more traditional kind, which already have their problems.… The best news is that the United States remains a healthy, vibrant, vigorous society. So in a real pinch, we can still pull ourselves together. Unfortunately, it will probably take another big hit. And a very different quality of leadership. Maybe we'll get it."

Frank Gaffney

"[Bush] doesn't in fact seem to be a man of principle who's steadfastly pursuing what he thinks is the right course. He talks about it, but the policy doesn't track with the rhetoric, and that's what creates the incoherence that causes us problems around the world and at home.
Those are some pretty strong statements coming from those who cooked up the grand cock-up.







The cover of the October issue of Vanity Fair was quite delicious, too. They punked The Weekly Standard with a cover-flap. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall when neo-con adherents realized they had been scammed.