Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Troop Movement

Next week, The Nation will publish a report on a movement of Active Duty, Guard and Reserve personnel who have organized a movement calling for withdrawal of forces from Iraq.

A mere seven weeks ago, An Appeal for Redress appeared on the internet, and since then nearly a thousand military members, includign a sizable number of officers, have signed their names to the petition.

During the Viet Nam war, you may recall that approximately 1300 active duty personnel signed a letter to the New York Times, but this...This is unprecedented in an all-volunteer military. During Viet Nam, the percentage of draftees in uniform was substantial. But these people speaking out today are all volunteers, and that fact gives their act of speaking out a degree of gravity that should be attention-grabbing even for the 30% drinking the Kool-Aid.

Every single signature on the Appeal for Redress is that of a volunteer. Many of those volunteers joined up after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. Now they find themselves getting shot at and attacked by IED's in a country that had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11.

Many are feeling not merely misled, but that they were flat-out lied to. They don't like it any more than anyone else does. Hell, they probably like it even less, because the lies could cost them their lives.

But don't take my word for it. Read these words from a 20-year-old USAF E-4:
I supported the war when I joined because I thought it was justified. Only after my own research and the truth coming out did I learn how wrong I was, how - for lack of a better word - how brainwashed I was.

Now I know the war is illegal, unjustified and that our troops have no reason for being there.

When I saw an article about the Appeal in the Air Force Times I went online right away and signed it and have encouraged others to do the same.
There is an unspoken, tacit agreement between a volunteer military force and it's government. Those who serve agree to do so without question, and in return, it is understood that their government will only enter into conflict when there is no other option remaining. The government agrees to respect and honor the troops who serve and not take them for granted, abuse their trust or their patriotism and not start wars of choice. The government agrees to abide by international laws and treaties. (We have to honor those, we are not only not alone on the planet, we are trying to have a civilization here, after all.)

In other words, the government agrees not to make war criminals of the United States military forces! Or at least that was the deal before the aWol Bush administration. Now, not so much is guaranteed.

What that man has done to the military and our ability to defend ourselves and respond to disasters is reason enough for the House of Representatives to draft articles of Impeachment for this president, Vice President and several members of the cabinet.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

The volunteer military is in trouble

For 33 years we have relied on service to come from an innate sense of duty, and many people of honor have stepped up. I am proud to call many of them family and many more of them friends.

An all-volunteer force carries an implied bargain. I will give my service to the nation and in return the nation will not misuse and abuse me. I will volunteer to serve; and in exchange you will agree to only send me into harm’s way when it is a last resort.

The bargain has been broken. Tour dates have been extended. I can not express how sacred that exit date is. I have circled that date on my calendar and marked the days off one by one. I tremble with rage as I think about those people who have circled that date only to have it snatched away.

The services are quick to tell you how they exceeded recruitment goals by a couple of hundred per branch. What they aren’t telling you is that the regular Army is missing 3500 officers throughout the ranks. They are not telling qualified recruits that OCS is an option because they need those numbers among the enlisted ranks.

The Army Reserves is missing nearly 11,000 Lieutenants and Captains in the ranks. But recruits with degrees are not being informed that they qualify for OCS. Missing so many officers and passing up the opportunity to groom new ones, who exactly is going to lead these new waivered troops?

They are not telling you that 17% of the recruits that are being accepted are getting in on waivers for psychological, character and medical reasons. Recruits who would never have been accepted five years ago are being aggressively recruited. Cheating is happening and recruiters are lying. (Do I need to make my Honor Code speech here, or do you know it by heart at this point?)

I had a run in with a recruiter recently that ended with me showing my ID, demanding to see his and me calling his commander.

Retired (Four Star) General Barry McCaffrey laments the lack of political support for the war effort. Politicians aren’t rallying the troops. He laments that the closest any politician has come to calling to arms was the president at Fort Bragg a year ago saying that if you chose to serve, it’s an honorable career.

“We need people to fight.” says McCaffrey.

Perhaps General, more people would be willing to step up and fight if they were not being lied to by recruiters, and if they were not being sent off to fight and die for more lies. People tend to catch on to the bullshit sooner or later, and then you end up compromised in order to perpetuate the lie. And if you compromise too much, you destroy yourself in the process. When you ride the tiger, you dare not dismount.

We have about two years to turn this ship around, and since we have a civilian led military, we need civilian input. We need retired officers and NCO’s and ordinary citizens like you to band together and form citizen advisory panels. These panels need to pressure congress to keep the governments end of the bargain that is made with the troops who volunteer. Those troops give up their voice in order to protect ours. We have a responsibility to them to speak on their behalf (the military defends democracy but it doesn’t practice it) and demand they not be misused and abused. If someone is willing to get shot at for me, just try to shut me up on their behalf!

Citizen involvement and discussion of mandatory national service needs to take place. If Joe and Jane Mini-van Split-Level have to think about the possibility of Tiffany or Brooks suiting up and getting shot at; we would see a hell of a lot higher standards applied before engaging in hostilities.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Military Times Publishing Group to call for Rumsfeld's ouster

On Monday, all four publications of the Military Times group will call for the ouster of Donald Rumsfeld. Details are sketchy at this point, but this is significant and could sway conservative voters.

As for me, I am feeling very positive about the military that has been part of my life since the moment I was born, on a Navy base.

I have been concerned about the state of health of the Honor Code for some time, as anyone who has read this blog knows. Now I'm breathing easier. The officers of our military will not allow a Tiannanmen Square to happen here.